![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Inheritance tax is payable on the estate of a deceased
person. We find it is a tax which will
affect most of our clients. Anne Hutchings wrote two articles for
Chemist & Druggist on Inheritance Tax Planning and these are reproduced
below.
Many pharmacists are unaware of the huge legacy they will be leaving the Inland Revenue when they die. With the recent surge in house prices the value of the family home can take many pharmacists into the inheritance tax (IHT) trap. However, with careful planning this tax can be completely wiped out.
The first step is to estimate how much you are likely to owe the taxman. To do this add up the current value of:
The above is only a general guideline and does not, for example, take into account business assets as special exemptions apply, life insurance or pension funds. It also assumes that the full £255,000 exemption is available, this may not be the case if lifetime gifts were made within 7 years of death.
There are many ways of reducing IHT, for the remainder of this article I will examine some of the gift reliefs and exemptions.
Lifetime gifts
You can make gifts of assets, cash, properties etc during your lifetime and as long as you live for at least 7 years after making the gift it will drop out of your estate. Unfortunately with tax there are usually exceptions to the rule and this is the case with IHT. The danger zones are:
There are some specific lifetime gifts which are totally exempt from IHT regardless of how long you live. The ones worth mentioning are:
Tip: Be careful if you are gifting anything other than cash that you do not trigger other tax liabilities such as capital gains tax. Generally assets given away will be treated by the Inland Revenue as having been disposed of at their current market value.
Wills
It’s estimated that nearly 70% of the population have
not made a will. It is important to make a will not just because of IHT but
also to ensure that your assets go to the people whom you want to benefit.
To illustrate the point look at the following example: Mr Patel has a home worth £500,000, a share portfolio worth £300,000, an investment property worth £150,000 and cash of £20,000. He dies leaving a widow, they do not have any children. Mr Patel's parents are still alive. Unfortunately Mr Patel did not leave a will so his estate will be divided under intestacy rules as follows:
When Mr Patel’s parents die IHT will be payable again and this could be as much as £133,200 depending on the value of their other assets. When Mr Patel’s wife dies the tax on her estate will be (£585,000 - £255,000 exemption at 40%) £132,000. Therefore, in the above example the overall IHT which could be payable as a result of Mr Patel’s death without a will is £317,200.
If instead Mr Patel had made a will leaving everything to his wife there would have been no IHT liability when he died. However, when the wife died the inheritance tax on her estate would be £286,000 (assets £970,000 less exemption £255,000 taxed at 40%).
Married couples should consider the following:
Just as a quick reminder, inheritance tax (IHT) is payable on death, based on the value of the deceased’s estate at a rate of 40%, after various exemptions. The main exemptions are the first £255,000, (assuming it has not been used during the individuals lifetime), transfers to the deceased’s spouse and business property relief.
The family home is a major asset for most pharmacists, but unfortunately when it comes to inheritance tax (IHT) there is no exemption. The value of the property is added to the other assets in the individual’s estate and charged to IHT accordingly. The family home accounts for over 40% of the IHT collected by the Inland Revenue.
For example Mr Jackson a retired pharmacist died leaving his home worth £450,000 and some cash and shares worth £150,000 to his son. Sadly there is another beneficiary, the taxman. The IHT would be:
How can IHT on the family home be avoided?
During his lifetime, Mr Jackson could have moved out of the property and then given it to his son. As long as he lived for 7 years after making the gift it would be tax free. It would not work for IHT purposes if Mr Jackson had continued to live in the property, the Inland Revenue would disregard the gift. This is because of the reservation of benefit rule whereby if you gift an asset but retain a beneficial interest in it the transaction is ignored for IHT purposes.
Mr Jackson could have given the property to his son and continued to live in it if he then paid his son a commercial rent. The rent payment would also help to reduce the value of Mr Jacksons estate for IHT. There is a possible downside to this depending on the recipient’s circumstances and that is the recipient would be liable for tax on the rent.
Mr Jackson may have been able to avoid IHT on the family home by creating a long lease over the property which became effective in the future in say 10 or 20 years. The lease would have been gifted into trust with Mr Jackson and his son as beneficiaries. As it gets nearer to the time when the lease commences the value in the freehold will have reduced. If the timing was right at Mr Jacksons death his value in the property will have substantially diminished. This could have taken the value of his estate to under the £255,000 IHT threshold. There are a number of schemes around involving trusts. However, the Revenue do tend to challenge many of these schemes so expert up to the minute advice should be taken before embarking on this type of more adventurous tax planning.
Business exemptions
Pharmacists who own their own businesses should qualify for business property relief. Generally if a pharmacist runs his/her business through a company the shares in that company should be exempt from IHT. Also if the pharmacist owns business premises which the pharmacy occupies there is a 50% IHT exemption.
Pharmacist Miss Casey died last November. She had operated her business through Casey Chemist Ltd for many years The company was valued at £950,000 when she died. In addition she owned the freehold of the business premises valued at £350,000. The IHT position is:
Tip: If Casey Ltd had owned the business premises there would have been no IHT liability. This is because Casey Ltd which was an unquoted company owned by Miss Casey qualified for 100% exemption. This can be a reason for maximizing the value of a company by including qualifying assets in it such as the trading premises. However, the IHT position should not be isolated, it is also important to consider capital gains tax issues which are beyond the scope of this article. In addition the pharmacists’ long term objectives must not be overlooked. Sometimes it can be more flexible for pharmacists to own the business premises personally so that after the business has been sold the premises are retained to provide rental income in the pharmacists’ retirement.
Pharmacists who trade as sole traders or partnerships can also qualify for the 100% business property IHT exemption.
There are conditions which need to be met in order to qualify for the business property relief. I will briefly outline the main ones applicable to pharmacy businesses.
The business must be trading with a view to profit, this condition should be easily met. However, if substantial investments have been built up in, for example, the pharmacists trading company this may disqualify the company from business property relief. It is not uncommon for pharmacists to build property and share portfolios using the funds in their companies to do so.
To qualify for business property relief the business asset must have been owned for a minimum of two years.
When a pharmacist sells their business they should review their potential IHT liability as their circumstances will have changed. They will no longer have part of their estate qualifying for business property relief so the potential IHT on their death will increase, sometimes dramatically.
Mr Patel sold his pharmacy business for £500,000. Prior to the sale the business qualified for 100% business property relief. After the business was sold Mr Patel had cash of £500,000.
If Mr Patel had died just before he sold the business, or just after he sold it the IHT position would be:
Tip: When making a Will, leaving business property to a spouse means that business property relief is wasted. It would be preferable from a tax planning perspective to leave business assets to the children.
The legislation is complicated and the interaction of other taxes such as capital gains should be considered so it is vital to take professional advice. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |
Copyright © 2004-2007 Hutchings & Co
Helping small businesses and their owners